Ken Ham proves he is a moron.

Standard

Dave the Atheist

https://answersingenesis.org/archaeology/ancient-egypt/doesnt-egyptian-chronology-prove-bible-unreliable/

Let me sum up here with the basic assumptions presented by AiG.

1. The bible they read is true.
2. Any conflicts with number 1 must be altered to include over lapping rulers and altering dating methods, altering outside historical documents including those done by the engineers.
3. print results.

When you start with the answer you want, you will twist data to fit it, so in that spirit I will prove Ken Ham is a moron.

1. Ken Ham is a moron
2. Everything Ken Ham says seems stupid to me and when it is not I must refer to number one.
3. Ken Ham must be a moron.

View original post

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s