Let me sum up here with the basic assumptions presented by AiG.
1. The bible they read is true.
2. Any conflicts with number 1 must be altered to include over lapping rulers and altering dating methods, altering outside historical documents including those done by the engineers.
3. print results.
When you start with the answer you want, you will twist data to fit it, so in that spirit I will prove Ken Ham is a moron.
1. Ken Ham is a moron
2. Everything Ken Ham says seems stupid to me and when it is not I must refer to number one.
3. Ken Ham must be a moron.